Skip to Content

Department of Cognitive Science

The hypothesis testing brain: some philosophical applications

Jakob Hohwy (jakob.hohwy@monash.edu.au)
School of Philosophy and Bioethics, Monash University

Abstract

According to one theory, the brain is a sophisticated hypothesis tester: perception is Bayesian unconscious inference where the brain actively uses predictions to test, and then refine, models about what the causes of its sensory input might be. The brain's task is simply continually to minimise prediction error. This theory, which is getting increasingly popular, holds great explanatory promise for a number of central areas of research at the intersection of philosophy and cognitive neuroscience. I show how the theory can help us understand striking phenomena at three cognitive levels: vision, sensory integration, and belief. First, I illustrate central aspects of the theory by showing how it provides a nice explanation of why binocular rivalry occurs. Then I suggest how the theory may explain the role of the unified sense of self in rubber hand and full body illusions driven by visuotactile conflict. Finally, I show how it provides an approach to delusion formation that I consistent with one-deficit accounts of monothematic delusions.

Citation details for this article:

Hohwy, J. (2010). The hypothesis testing brain: some philosophical applications. In W. Christensen, E. Schier, and J. Sutton (Eds.), ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 135-144). Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.

DOI: 10.5096/ASCS200922
Download the PDF here

References

  1. Aimola Davies, A. M. and Davies, M. (2009). Explaining pathologies of belief. In M. R. Broome and L. Bortolotti (Eds.), Psychiatry as Cognitive Neuroscience: Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Alais, D. and Blake, R. (Eds.) (2005). Binocular Rivalry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  3. Armel, K. C. and Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1499-1506. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2364
  4. Aspell, J. E., B. Lenggenhager, et al. (2009). Keeping in Touch with One's Self: Multisensory Mechanisms of Self-Consciousness. PLoS ONE, 4, e6488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006488
  5. Blake, R. and N. K. Logothetis (2002). Visual competition. Nature Rev. Neurosci., 3, 13-21.
  6. Blakemore, S.-J., D. M. Wolpert, et al. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635-640. doi: 10.1038/2870
  7. Bortolotti, L. (2009). Delusions and Other Irrational Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Botvinick, M. & J. Cohen (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756-756. doi: 10.1038/35784
  9. Coltheart, M. (2007). Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester), 60, 1041-1062. doi: 10.1080/17470210701338071
  10. Davies, M. and M. Coltheart (2000). Introduction: pathologies of belief. Mind and Language, 15, 1-46. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00122
  11. Davies, M., M. Coltheart, et al. (2001). Monothematic delusions: Toward a two-factor account. Philosophy, Psychiatry, Psychology, 8, 133-158.
  12. Dayan, P. (1998). A Hierarchical Model of Binocular Rivalry. Neural Computation, 10, 1119 - 1135. doi: 10.1162/089976698300017377
  13. Ehrsson, H. H. (2007). The Experimental Induction of Out-of-Body Experiences. Science, 317, 1048-. doi: 10.1126/science.1142175
  14. Fletcher, P. C. and C. D. Frith (2009). Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci, 10, 48-58. doi: 10.1038/nrn2536
  15. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge MA.: MIT Press.
  16. Friston, K. (2003). Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Networks, 16, 1325-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2003.06.005
  17. Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 360, 815-836. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
  18. Friston, K. (2008). Hierarchical Models in the Brain. PLoS Computational Biology, 4, e1000211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000211
  19. Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005
  20. Friston, K. J. and K. Stephan (2007). Free energy and the brain. Synthese, 159, 417-458. doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9237-y
  21. Frith, C., S.-J. Blakemore, et al. (2000). Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research Reviews, 31, 357-363. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00052-1
  22. Frith, C., R. Perry, et al. (1999). The neural correlates of conscious experience: an experimental framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 105. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01281-4
  23. Gigante, G., M. Mattia, et al. (2009). Bistable Perception Modeled as Competing Stochastic Integrations at Two Levels. PLoS Comput Biol, 5, e1000430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000430
  24. Gregory, R. L. (1980). Perceptions as hypotheses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Series B, Biological Sciences, 290, 181-197.
  25. Gregory, R. L. (1998). Eye and Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Helmholtz, H. v. (1860). Treatise on Physiological Optics. New York: Dover.
  27. Hohwy, J. (2007). The search for neural correlates of consciousness. Philosophy Compass, 2, 461–474.
  28. Hohwy, J. and B. Paton (under review). Explaining away the body.
  29. Hohwy, J., A. Roepstorff, et al. (2008). Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition, 108, 687-701.
  30. Hohwy, J. and R. Rosenberg (2005). Unusual experiences, reality testing, and delusions of control. Mind & Language, 20, 141-162.
  31. Jensen, F. V. and S. L. Lauritzen (2000). Probabilistic networks. Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems: Algorithms for uncertainty and defeasible reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  32. Kersten, D., P. Mamassian, et al. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 271.
  33. Kiebel, S. J., J. Daunizeau, et al. (2008). A Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain. PLoS Computational Biology, 4, e1000209.
  34. Körding, K. P., U. Beierholm, et al. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. Plos One, 2, e943.
  35. Lenggenhager, B., M. Mouthon, et al. (2009). Spatial aspects of bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 110-117.
  36. Lenggenhager, B., T. Tadi, et al. (2007). Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness. Science, 317, 1096.
  37. Maher, B. A. (1974). Delusional thinking and perceptual disorder. Journal of Individual Psychology, 30, 98-113.
  38. Metzinger, T. (2009). The Ego Tunnel. New York: Basic Books.
  39. Mumford, D. (1992). On the computational architecture of the neocortex. Biological Cybernetics, 66, 241.
  40. Noest, A. A. J., R. R. van Ee, et al. (2007). Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. Journal of Vision, 7, 10.
  41. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Schwabe, L. and O. Blanke (2008). The vestibular component in out-of-body experiences: a computational approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 1-10.
  43. Slater, M., D. P. Marcos, et al. (2009). Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience.
  44. Song, C. and H. Yao (2009). Duality in Binocular Rivalry: Distinct Sensitivity of Percept Sequence and Percept Duration to Imbalance between Monocular Stimuli. PLoS ONE, 4, e6912.
  45. Spence, S. A. (1997). A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain, 120, 1997-2011.
  46. Tsakiris, M. and P. Haggard (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 31, 80.
  47. Wellman, M. P. and M. Henrion (1993). Explaining 'explaining away'. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15, 287-292.
  48. White, P. A. (2009). Property Transmission: An Explanatory Account of the Role of Similarity Information in Causal Inference. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 774-793.
  49. Wilson, H. R. (2007). Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory. Vision Research, 47, 2741-2750.

Further Information

Contact Details

Telephone: (02) 9850 9599
Fax : (02) 9850 6059
Email : cogsci@mq.edu.au
Web : www.cogsci.mq.edu.au