Skip to Content

Department of Cognitive Science

The pleasure and pathology of narrative

Susan Green (susanjgreen@bigpond.com)
Macquarie University, Department of English, Sydney

Abstract

Literary texts, in particular novels, provide unique ways of representing and exploring the workings of the human mind. Our capacity and willingness to be immersed in an alternative world through the power of narrative suggests our peculiar sensitivity to this form of communication and its capacity to structure our experience. But our hunger for narrative suggests a desire for knowledge as well as a desire for the 'right' story: when this desiring in the imagination motivates behaviour and affects decisions, narrative can become dangerous. This paper investigates the power of narrative in Ian McEwan's novel Atonement (2001). It explores narrative imagination as an asset as well as an affliction; the role of confabulation; and the destructive power of narrative in terms of what these phenomena, when represented in fiction, can tell us about the human mind.

Citation details for this article:

Green, S. (2010). The Pleasure and Pathology of Narrative. In W. Christensen, E. Schier, and J. Sutton (Eds.), ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 114-118). Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.

DOI: 10.5096/ASCS200918
Download the PDF here

References

  1. Abbott, H. P. (2002). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Austen, J. (1818, 1971). Northanger Abbey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Barthes, R. (1975). The pleasure of the text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.
  4. Bortolotti, L. (2008, November 28). Does confabulation have any epistemic benefits? Paper presented at Macquarie University's Centre for Cognitive Science 2008 ‘Memory Day’.
  5. Cook, J. Groes, S. & Sage, V. (2009). Journeys without maps: An interview with Ian McEwan. In S. Groes (Ed.), Ian McEwan: Contemporary critical perspectives. London and New York: Continuum.
  6. Conrad, J. (1945). The nigger of the narcissus. London: J. M. Dent and sons Ltd.
  7. Currie, G. (1999). Narrative Desire. In C. Plantinga & G. M Smith (Eds.), Passionate views: Film, cognition, and emotion. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
  8. Currie, G. (2000). Imagination, delusion and Hallucinations. Mind and Language, 15.1, 168-183. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00128
  9. Currie, G. & Ravenscroft, I. (2002). Recreative minds: Imagination in philosophy and psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Davies, M., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Introduction: Pathologies of belief. Mind and Language, 15.1, 1-46. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00122
  11. De Lauretis, T. (2000). Desire in narrative. In Martin McQuillan (Ed.), The narrative reader. London and New York: Routledge, 204-212.
  12. Dennett, D. (1988, September 16-22). Why everyone is a novelist. Times Literary Supplement, pp.1016, 1028-1029.
  13. Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The human evolution of consciousness. New York and London: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc.
  14. Fivush, R., Marin, K. & Crawford, M. (2007). Children's narratives and well-being. Cognition and Emotion, 21.7, 1414-1434.
  15. Freud, S. (1961). Beyond the pleasure principle. Trans. James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton and Company Inc.
  16. Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  17. Gerrig, R. J., & Rapp. D. N. (2004). Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25.2, 265-281. doi: 10.1215/03335372-25-2-265
  18. Hirstein, W. (2005). Brain fiction: Self-Deception and the riddle of confabulation. Cambridge, Mass. & London, England: MIT Press.
  19. Hutto, D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge Massachusetts & London, England: The MIT Press.
  20. James, H. (1881, 1975). The portrait of a lady. New York: Norton.
  21. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  22. McEwan, I. (2001). Atonement. London: Jonathan Cape.
  23. McQuillan, M. (Ed.) (2000). Introduction. The narrative reader. London & New York: Routledge.
  24. Nichols, S. (2006). Just the imagination: Why imagining doesn't behave like believing. Mind and Language, 21.4, 459-474.
  25. Onions, C. T. (1966). Oxford dictionary of English etymology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  26. Sellers, S. (Ed.) (1994). Hélène Cixous: Reader. London: Routledge.
  27. Smith, Z. (2005). Zadie Smith talks with Ian McEwan. The Believer, 3.6, 47-63.
  28. Steen, F. (2002). Cognitive approaches to literature: A discussion group at the MLA. Retrieved April 1, 2008, from http://cogweb.ucla.edu/culture/CAL/index.html
  29. Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  30. Wood, J. (2002, March 21). The trick of truth. The New Republic Online. Retrieved July 6, 2009, from http://www.powells.com/review/2002_03_21.html
  31. Wood, J. (2008). How fiction works. London: Jonathan Cape.
  32. Woolf, V. (1927, 2008). Poetry, fiction and the future. In D. Bradshaw (Ed.), Virginia Woolf: Selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Woolf, V. (1939, 1976). A sketch of the past. In J. Schulkind (Ed.), Moments of being: Unpublished autobiographical writings. London: Chatto and Windus.
  34. Zalewski, D. (2009). The background hum: Ian McEwan's art of unease. The New Yorker. Feb. 23, 2009.

Further Information

Seminars

Who is Visiting

Contact Details

Telephone: (02) 9850 9599
Fax : (02) 9850 6059
Email : cogsci@mq.edu.au
Web : www.cogsci.mq.edu.au