Skip to Content

Department of Cognitive Science

Impaired face recognition and the mirrored-self misidentification delusion: Recreating the delusion using hypnosis

Michael Connors (mconnors@maccs.mq.edu.au)
Amanda Barnier (abarnier@maccs.mq.edu.au)
Max Coltheart (max@maccs.mq.edu.au)
Rochelle Cox (rcox@maccs.mq.edu.au)
Robyn Langdon (rlangdon@maccs.mq.edu.au)
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University

Abstract

Mirrored-self misidentification is the delusional belief that one's own reflection in the mirror is a stranger. Current theories suggest that this delusion can occur when two factors are present: a deficit in face processing which is responsible for the content of the delusion (Factor 1) and a deficit in belief evaluation which accounts for the failure to reject the delusional belief (Factor 2). Previous research has used hypnosis to model this delusion. This research has found that a suggestion in hypnosis either to see a stranger in the mirror (a fully-formed suggestion) or to not recognise the person in the mirror (a suggestion for Factor 1 alone) can produce a hypnotic delusion with features strikingly similar to the clinical condition. The present study sought to directly compare these two approaches to see which best approximated the clinical condition. Fifty-two high hypnotisable participants received a hypnotic suggestion to either see a stranger in the mirror (fully-formed) or to not recognise the person in the mirror (Factor 1 alone). Half of the participants received the suggestion while hypnotised and the other half received the suggestion in their normal waking state. Following the suggestion, participants were asked to look into a mirror and to describe what they could see. Participants who reported seeing someone other than themselves were then given a series of clinically inspired challenges to determine the resilience of their delusion. Results support the idea that both types of hypnotic suggestion can produce a highly compelling mirrored-self misidentification delusion which is resistant to challenge. In particular, results suggest that the Factor 1 suggestion in hypnosis is especially effective at producing the delusion and that the additional information contained in the fully-formed suggestion is unnecessary. Results are discussed in terms of the two-factor theory of delusions.

Citation details for this article:

Connors, M., Barnier, A., Coltheart, M., Cox, R., Langdon, R. (2010). Impaired face recognition and the mirrored-self misidentification delusion: Recreating the delusion using hypnosis. In W. Christensen, E. Schier, and J. Sutton (Eds.), ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 61-66). Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.

DOI: 10.5096/ASCS200910
Download the PDF here

References

  1. Barnier, A. J., Cox, R., E., O'Connor, A., Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., Breen, N., & Turner, M. (2008). Developing hypnotic analogues of clinical delusions: Mirrored-self misidentification. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 13, 406-430. doi: 10.1080/13546800802355666
  2. Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Dohle, C., Seitz, R. J., & Freund, H. J. (1999). Mirror agnosia and mirror ataxia constitute different parietal lobe disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 51-61.
  3. Breen, N., Caine, D., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Mirrored-self misidentification: Two cases of focal onset dementia. Neurocase, 7, 239-254.
  4. Bryant, R.A., & Mallard, D. (2005). Reality monitoring in hypnosis: A real-simulating analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 13-25.
  5. Bryant, R. A., & McConkey, K. M. (1989). Hypnotic blindness, awareness, and attribution. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 443-447.
  6. Burns, A., Jacoby, R., & Levy, R. (1990). Psychiatric phenomena in Alzheimer's disease II: Disorders of perception. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 76-81.
  7. Coltheart, M. (2007). The 33rd Bartlett Lecture: Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1041-1062.
  8. Connors, M. H. E., Barnier, A. J., Coltheart, M., Cox, R. E., & Langdon, R. (in preparation). Mirrored-self misidentification in the laboratory: Recreating the delusion from its component factors.
  9. Cox, R. E., & Barnier, A. J. (2009) Hypnotic illusions and clinical delusions: A hypnotic paradigm for investigating delusions of misidentification. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 57, 1-32. doi: 10.1080/00207140802463419
  10. Davies, M., Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., & Breen, N. (2002). Monothematic delusions: Towards a two-factor account. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 8, 133-158
  11. Deutsch, L. H., Bylsma, F. W., Rovner, B. W., Steele, C., & Folstein, M. F. (1991). Psychosis and physical aggression in probable Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Psychiatry, 9, 1159-1163.
  12. Förstl, H., Besthorn, C., Burns, A., Geiger-Kabisch, C., Levy, R., & Sattel, A. (1994). Delusional misidentification in Alzheimer's Disease: A summary of clinical and biological aspects. Psychopathology, 27, 194-199. doi: 10.1159/000284869
  13. Gluckman, L. K. (1968). A case of Capgras syndrome. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 39-43. doi: 10.3109/00048676809159206
  14. Halligan, P. W., Bass, C., & Wade, D. T. (2000). New approaches to conversion hysteria. British Medical Journal, 320, 1488-1489. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1488
  15. Hyodo, T., Ikeda, M., Komori, K., Hokoishi, K., Fukuhara, R., Isikawa, T., Mori, T., Toyota, Y., Matsumoto, T., Matsumoto, N., & Tanabe, H. (2005). Epidemiology of mirror sign in Alzheimer's disease. Psychogeriatrics, 5, A28.
  16. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Hoyt, I. P. (1988). Hypnosis and the psychology of delusions. In T. M. Oltmanns & B. A. Maher (Eds.), Delusional Beliefs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Langdon, R., & Coltheart, M. (2000). The cognitive neuropsychology of delusions. Mind & Language, 15, 184-218. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00129
  18. Lawrence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & du Chéné, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. In M. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 255-282). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. McKay, R., Langdon, R., & Coltheart, M. (2005). "Sleights of mind": Delusions, defences, and self-deception. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 10, 305-326. doi: 10.1080/13546800444000074
  20. Mendez, M. F., Martin, R. J., Smyth, K. A., & Whitehouse, P. J. (1992). Disturbances of person identification in Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 180, 94-96.
  21. Noble, J., & McConkey, K. M. (1995). Hypnotic sex change: Creating and challenging a delusion in the laboratory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 69-74. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.69
  22. Nogrady, H., McConkey, K.M., & Perry, C. (1985). Enhancing visual memory: Trying hypnosis, trying imagination, and trying again. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 223-235. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.94.2.195
  23. Oakley, D. A. (2006). Hypnosis as a tool in research: Experimental psychopathology. Contemporary Hypnosis, 23, 3-14. doi: 10.1002/ch.34
  24. Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2009). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 264-270. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004
  25. Rubin, E. H., Drevets, W. C., & Burke, W. J. (1988). The nature of psychotic symptoms in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry & Neurology, 1, 16-20.
  26. Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Knowledge without awareness: An autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science, 228, 1453-1454. doi: 10.1126/science.4012303
  27. Turner, M., Coltheart, M., Metcalf, K., & Langdon, R. (2006, July). What is the relationship between confabulation and delusion? Paper presented at ICOM-4: Fourth International Conference on Memory, Sydney, Australia.
  28. Woody, E., & Szechtman, H. (2000). Hypnotic hallucinations: Towards a biology of epistemology. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17, 4-14.
  29. Zimbardo, P. G., Andersen, S. M., & Kabat, L. G. (1981). Induced hearing deficit generates experimental paranoia. Science, 212, 1529-1531. doi: 10.1126/science.7233242

Further Information

Seminars

Who is Visiting

Contact Details

Telephone: (02) 9850 9599
Fax : (02) 9850 6059
Email : cogsci@mq.edu.au
Web : www.cogsci.mq.edu.au